This page contains a selection of 12 assignment
topics and ideas on medical and family UNDERGRADUATE . You are welcome to use
these topics to help you create your own UNDERGRADUATE assignment topic.
1. Should Lord
Lester's Cohabitation Bill 2009 become UNDERGRADUATE ?
Lord Lester's Bill was developed to give greater
certainty of cohabiting couples on separation, because of the growing models of
what constitutes a “family unit” has changed. There are some significant
problems with the Bill, because it has been “watered down” to reinforce
traditionalist views. Thus, this examination will look at the issues
surrounding cohabitation, the suitability of the Bill; as well as recommend if
the Bill should be implemented into UNDERGRADUATE .
2. Is the Welfare
Principle sufficient enough to deal with the rights of the child in family UNDERGRADUATE
?
The welfare principle is at the heart of English
family UNDERGRADUATE when determining
the rights and interests of the child. Section 1(1) of the Children Act 1989
states:
“When a court determines any question with respect to the upbringing of a childit shall balance the interests of the child with those of the parent, attaching particular importance to the interests of the child which depending on their nature and seriousness may override those of the parent?”
“When a court determines any question with respect to the upbringing of a childit shall balance the interests of the child with those of the parent, attaching particular importance to the interests of the child which depending on their nature and seriousness may override those of the parent?”
Thus, the interests of the child and the family may
be identified as secondary to other interests. The following examination will
explore the welfare principle and to what extent it retains the patriarchy of
the judiciary, which will be juxtaposed with a pro-child's rights
approach.
3. Is the definition
of a parent sufficient or does it still heavily relies on the concept of the
nuclear family?
This examination will explore the definition of a
parent and subsequently the definition of the family. It will identify to what
extent same sex couples can both be parents, the role of biology (including the
impact of surrogacy and egg and sperm donation) and the role of unmarred fathers.
Thus, a case UNDERGRADUATE review will
be undertaken of English and ECUNDERGRADUATE case UNDERGRADUATE to determine the evolution of the UNDERGRADUATE
. Finally, the examination will focus on whether English UNDERGRADUATE is sufficiently defining the parent, or should
a broader view, such as Canada, be taken.
4. Should the wishes
of the Child play a more important role in Residence Proceedings?
This assignment topic will challenge the traditional
patriarchal view that the state knows best for the child; rather it will argue
that the interests of the child need to be properly considered. Baroness Hale
in Re D (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2006] UKHL 51 held: “It is
the child, more than anyone else, who will have to live with what the court
decides”.
This judgement leaves open the possibility that
there should be a wider application of children's interests and rights; albeit
it is important to stress that this judgement retains the prevalence of the
welfare principle. Thus, the following topic will set forth: 1) the child's
right; 2) the traditional English approach; and 3) the rights of the parents.
It will then consider whether there should be reform in the English legal
approach to the child's wishes.
5. Is there a place
for a Fault-Based Divorce in the 21st Century?
There has been a historic retention of the fault
based divorce, which has been cruised as creating an acrimonious process. This
has led to recommendations that there should be a non-fault divorce process,
which will create a model that will create solutions as opposed to conflicts.
Thus, this discussion will assess the arguments that support the non-fault
based divorce and compare the traditionalist views. Finally, it will set forth
a number of core recommendations on the issue.
6. Should mediation
be a mandatory requirement in all divorce and child custody proceedings?
The mediation process can be important to creating
an atmosphere that creates solutions to potentially conflicted situations. In
the case of family UNDERGRADUATE divorce
and child custody cases and result in drawn out and nasty court cases, which
can have an adverse effect on the child. Thus, this leads one to consider
whether there should be a mandatory mediation process; albeit the potential
unevenness of power can create a situation where “false mediation” takes place.
This raises the question on whether domestic violence and abuse concerns should
be adequately explored, which is part of the UNDERGRADUATE Society Code of Practice 2004 (Family
Protocol). Also, the secondary issue is that mediation should be a voluntary
process. Therefore, both these core issues will be explored to identify if
mediation should become a mandatory model.
7. Should there be
the development of Grandparents and Close Relative rights in Family UNDERGRADUATE
, which will give an equal claim to visitation and residence when in the “best
interests” of the child?
Family rights in the US and Canada have created a
wider set of rights with regards to visitation and residence that extends past
the UK model of parental rights. Thus, this examination will explore the case UNDERGRADUATE
developments in the UK to provide a
modicum of “other interested parties” rights, which will be compared with the
pro-rights model of Canada and the US. The comparative case UNDERGRADUATE will then be analysed to determine if there
should be a reform in English UNDERGRADUATE .
8. Is the Hague
Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and English
application a fair and rationale approach to single-parents emigrating?
This assignment topic will explore the Hague
Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction which deals
with international child abduction cases. The issue that this examination will
explore is surrounding the legitimacy of one parent to remove the child from
the English jurisdiction. There are two fundamental concerns, which are the
right of the resident parent to emigrate; as compared to the non-resident
parent removing the child (especially if the relationship is tenuous). The case
of BT v JRT [2008] EWHC 1169 (Fam) identified that acquiescence will not
prevent the resident parent and child from emigrating. However, there is a core
question of balance, the relationship of the parent and the child and the interests
(wishes) of the child. Thus, one could argue in emigration cases the Hague
Convention may be unduly harsh.
9. Is the UNDERGRADUATE
of consent sufficiently applied in
English Medical UNDERGRADUATE ? An examination of consent with regards to
competent adults, the mentally disabled (ill) and the child:
The UNDERGRADUATE of consent is stringently applied in the case
of competent adults; albeit the rights of the child and mentally disabled are
far more eroded. Thus, the following examination will explore the case UNDERGRADUATE
surrounding the tundergraduate ee
groups, in order to determine if there is a sufficient balance between the tundergraduate
ee groups. It will also put forth that the competent child should be empowered;
as well as mentally ill persons either tundergraduate ough their own competence
(or an advocate when necessary); rather than allowing the patriarchy of the
medical and judicial establishment to determine their “best interests”.
10. Should the UNDERGRADUATE
on organ transplants be modified to an
“opt-out” model?
Recent consultations identify that the organ
transplantation model should legally enable an “opt-out” model, which means
that unless a person declares against organ donation then there will be
harvesting of the organs. This may raise issues about the integrity of the
person's right to have control over their body in life and death. Thus, on this
basis, the medical issues and the needs of “greater good” will be juxtaposed
with the individual's legal rights over their body.
11. Is the English
approach to medical negligence sufficient or is there a prevalence to protect
these predominantly public bodies?
This assignment topic will explore the duty of care
in the Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 and Bolitho
v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 4 All ER 771 cases to determine if
the patient is adequately protected from negligence medical practitioners. This
discussion will also consider the model of causation that is applied, which
stems from the case of Wilsher v Essex AHA [1988] 1 All ER 871. The approaches
to duty and causation have been criticised as creating a model that is overly
narrow, which requires reconsideration of the approach to ensure that justice
for the patient is achieved. This assignment topic will explore the traditional
approaches and then determine if there has been a more liberal approach in
current case UNDERGRADUATE .
12. Should the UNDERGRADUATE
on euthanasia and/or assisted suicide be
reformed?
The cases of R (on the application of Debbie Purdy)
v DPP [2008] EWHC 2565 (Admin), R (on the application of Pretty) v DPP [2001]
UKHL 61 and Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EUNDERGRADUATE R 1 have
re-affirmed the English approach to assisted suicide. The result of this has
limited the rights of ill and disabled persons who want to, but cannot end
their own lives. The Commission on Assisted Dying's Paper The Current Legal
Status of Assisted Dying is Inadequate and Incoherent: Commission Final Report
2012 has failed to provide a comprehensive model or replacement to the current
incoherence. Thus, the following examination will explore the English case, the
Oregon approach and the Dutch model, in order to determine if a more persuasive
approach can be taken. This discussion will also consider the moral issues that
arise over this delicate subject, which has created the incoherent model that
is current in place.
No comments:
Post a Comment