Here are a selection of 6 assignment topics and
ideas on land, housing & equity UNDERGRADUATE for you. Please feel free to use these topics
to help you create your own assignment topic.
1. To what extent is
adverse possession an important right to prevent the growth of vacant
properties?
This assignment topic will consider adverse
possession in the pre and post Land Registration Act 2002. In addition, the Act
has not limited all rights, especially those that have accrued prior to its
incorporation. However, there is an interesting human rights quandary, because
there is the right to one's own property; albeit should this mean that the
property should be left vacant? Thus, the Housing Act 2004 has allowed councils
to enforce Empty Dwelling Management Orders and eventually enforced sales of
property. The question is whether the prevalence given to land ownership in the
Land Registration Act 2002 has created the empty property issues 10 years
later?
2. Is the
Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 significant to the modern regime of
Land UNDERGRADUATE ?
This assignment topic will explore the impact of the
Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 in comparison to the Perpetuities and
Accumulations Act 1964. Thus, it will explore the changes to the “wait and see”
approach; as well as the exclusion of commercial interests to determine if this
creates a modern approach to family-type interests. This is an interesting
topic that many jurisdictions have tried to balance and modernise with the
rights of the testator; thus an examination of the Irish and English approaches
will provide a comprehensive review.
3. Has the case of
Jones v Kernott [2011] ALL ER (D) 64 (Nov) clarified the concept of “Common
Intentions” in the Family Home Trust?
This examination will explore the modern
developments of the family home trust, as identified by Oxley v Hiscock [2004]
EWCA Civ 546, Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17and Jones v Kernott. The distinction
between imputed and inferred intentions has created a significant amount of
controversy; thus the following examination will explore the approaches and
determine if fairness has a role to play. This is especially important, because
in personam rights should be treated cautiously to prevent undue interference
with in rem rights.
4. Is the case UNDERGRADUATE
surrounding the concept of “knowing
receipt” and “knowing assistance” sufficient to provide the harmed claimant to
have effective equitable remedies?
The common UNDERGRADUATE approaches to equitable claims against third
parties who have acquired or helped another to acquire property inequitably are
confused. The main issue is what constitutes as knowledge, because the case of
Twinsectra v. Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164 held the littlest knowledge is
sufficient. English UNDERGRADUATE has
inferred a subjective element in the test, as confirmed in Royal Brunei
Airlines Sdn Bhd v. Tan [1995] 2 AC 378. The case of Abou-Rahmah v. Abacha
itself [2006] EWCA Civ 1492 identified a limited inference of constructive
knowledge; albeit is this enough? The Singapore case of George Raymond Zage III
v. Ho Chi Kwong [2010] 2 SLR 589 (CA) held an objective test should apply; thus
this examination will explore different common UNDERGRADUATE jurisdictions to this issue, in order to
identify whether the objective approach should apply.
5. Is the
Homelessness Act 2002 sufficient to deal with the growing homelessness in the
UK?
This assignment topic will explore the duties of
Local Authorities under the Act, which amended the Housing Act 1996. An
important question that is identifiable from the case of Ellis v Angus Council
[2011] CSOH 44 is the legal purpose of Guidance set by the devolved
governments, because the court held there was no obligation as the policies are
not part of statute. Thus, the discord between the codes and the statutory
obligations infer that the Homelessness Act 2002 is not fit for purpose.
6. Are the Prevention
from Harassment and Eviction provisions effectively protecting tenants
This assignment topic will explore the various
protections that are available to tenants to prevent Harassment and unUNDERGRADUATE
ful eviction; however the main question will be whether the body of UNDERGRADUATE
is cohesively and effectively enforced.
Thus, the human rights angle will be explored and when there is a duty for the
local authority to act, because there can be over-dismissiveness over such
disputes.
No comments:
Post a Comment